Difference between revisions of "Talk:83Plus:BCALLs:80BD"
(:-\) |
(I have to ask...) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Yay for wasting time! [[User:AndyJ|Andy Janata]] 19:03, 24 Feb 2006 (PST) | Yay for wasting time! [[User:AndyJ|Andy Janata]] 19:03, 24 Feb 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == I have to ask... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I just have to ask (it's in my philosophical nature)(I'm a Philosophy major)...WHY? Why would TI do this? here's my theory: | ||
| + | |||
| + | TI realized they were wasting A LOT of space in the OS, as well as the opportunity to create a whole list of new bcalls (or to make some other internal routines bcallable), but they didn't want to de-stabalize the OS (because TIOS is already SO stable), and as a way to patronize the programming community, they created bcalls such as this one and the other DoNothing bcalls. (i believe there was also a list of 4 or five other bcalls that just "ret"-ed). It also wastes space that could otherwise be hacked by illegal and evil TIOS h4x0rz... muahahahaha (TI's laugh at us)... | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Saibot84|Saibot84]] 00:35, 25 Feb 2006 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 01:35, 25 February 2006
Yay for wasting time! Andy Janata 19:03, 24 Feb 2006 (PST)
I have to ask...
I just have to ask (it's in my philosophical nature)(I'm a Philosophy major)...WHY? Why would TI do this? here's my theory:
TI realized they were wasting A LOT of space in the OS, as well as the opportunity to create a whole list of new bcalls (or to make some other internal routines bcallable), but they didn't want to de-stabalize the OS (because TIOS is already SO stable), and as a way to patronize the programming community, they created bcalls such as this one and the other DoNothing bcalls. (i believe there was also a list of 4 or five other bcalls that just "ret"-ed). It also wastes space that could otherwise be hacked by illegal and evil TIOS h4x0rz... muahahahaha (TI's laugh at us)...
Saibot84 00:35, 25 Feb 2006 (PST)
