Difference between revisions of "Talk:83Plus:OS:Page 0 Calls"
(hmm...) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Ideas? Anyways, just pile all our info into this single page for now (no point in making a bunch of pages and then having to revise stuff later.) --[[User:JasonM|JasonM]] 10:05, 7 Jun 2005 (PDT) | Ideas? Anyways, just pile all our info into this single page for now (no point in making a bunch of pages and then having to revise stuff later.) --[[User:JasonM|JasonM]] 10:05, 7 Jun 2005 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't see a problem with creating a new 'namespace' for these, so long as there really is a semi-OS-independent way to use them. Remember, though, that they are not intended to be used by apps -- if they were, they'd be B_CALLs. And I really don't want to see programs manually garbage-collecting whenever they feel like it! ([[User:FloppusMaximus]], too lazy to log in) 11:18, 7 Jun 2005 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:18, 7 June 2005
If you add an offset to that number and call it, you will always call the same function.
Is this true? I guess I've never seen this before, but it would be quite nice if it is. Anyways, we need to think up a way for naming pages (our usual address method won't work here.)
Ideas? Anyways, just pile all our info into this single page for now (no point in making a bunch of pages and then having to revise stuff later.) --JasonM 10:05, 7 Jun 2005 (PDT)
I don't see a problem with creating a new 'namespace' for these, so long as there really is a semi-OS-independent way to use them. Remember, though, that they are not intended to be used by apps -- if they were, they'd be B_CALLs. And I really don't want to see programs manually garbage-collecting whenever they feel like it! (User:FloppusMaximus, too lazy to log in) 11:18, 7 Jun 2005 (PDT)
