Difference between revisions of "Talk:83Plus:Ports:06"
From WikiTI
(Comments on 84P P06 mapping) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It appears that on an 84 Plus non-SE, you can't map RAM pages with port 6. --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 18:41, 19 Jul 2005 (PDT) | It appears that on an 84 Plus non-SE, you can't map RAM pages with port 6. --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 18:41, 19 Jul 2005 (PDT) | ||
:No one else has confirmed or denied this, but it seems to be true to me, so I updated the article page. If this is the case, it would appear to be a design defect. --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 16:27, 15 March 2006 (PST) | :No one else has confirmed or denied this, but it seems to be true to me, so I updated the article page. If this is the case, it would appear to be a design defect. --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 16:27, 15 March 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | :: Oops. LoadCIndPaged wont read from RAM pages on the 84+ (but will on the SE). The hardware appears to work just fine though. My bad. --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 13:44, 14 May 2006 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:44, 14 May 2006
It appears that on an 84 Plus non-SE, you can't map RAM pages with port 6. --Dan Englender 18:41, 19 Jul 2005 (PDT)
- No one else has confirmed or denied this, but it seems to be true to me, so I updated the article page. If this is the case, it would appear to be a design defect. --Dan Englender 16:27, 15 March 2006 (PST)
- Oops. LoadCIndPaged wont read from RAM pages on the 84+ (but will on the SE). The hardware appears to work just fine though. My bad. --Dan Englender 13:44, 14 May 2006 (PDT)
