Difference between revisions of "Z80 Optimization"
(Fixed "look up table" example (original and optimized versions now have exactly the same behavior))
(Improved "look up table" example)
|Line 657:||Line 657:|
Revision as of 09:10, 31 August 2015
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Registers and Memory
- 3 General Algorithms
- 4 Self Modifying Code
- 5 Small Tricks
- 6 Setting flags
- 7 Tools of the job
- 8 Very specific optimizations (hardly practical)
- 9 Crazy, "magick", hacks and obscure optimization's tricks
- 10 Related topics
- 11 Acknowledgements
Sometimes it is needed some extra speed in ASM or make your game smaller to fit on the calculator. Examples: consuming graphics/data programs and graphics code of mapping, grayscale and 3D graphics.
If you are just looking for cutting some bytes go straight to small tricks in this topic.
Registers and Memory
Generally good algorithms on z80 use registers in a appropriate form. It is also a good practise to keep a convention and plan how you are going to use the registers.
General use of registers:
- a - 8-bit accumulator
- b - counter
- c,d,e,h,l auxiliary to accumulator and copy of b or a
- hl - 16-bit accumulator/pointer of a address memory
- de - pointer of a destination address memory
- bc - 16-bit counter
- ix - index register/pointer to table in memory/save copy of hl/pointer to memory when hl and de are being used
- iy - index register/pointer to table in memory (use when there is no other option or need optimal execution) (disable interrupts and on exit restore the original value because TI-OS uses)
8-bit vs. 16-bit Operations
The z80 processor makes faster operations on 8-bit values. Code dealing with 16-bit register tends to be bigger and slower because of the equivalent 16-bit instruction is slower or it does not exist and needs to be replaced with more instructions. And sometimes the equivalent 16-bit instruction is 1 more byte. If you use ix or iy registers operations are even slower and always are 1 byte bigger for each instruction. So try to convert your code to use hl and de instead of ix and iy.
In a practical example, imagine: - you pass through the accumulator a value to a routine - if the only valid values of the accumulator range from 0 to 63 and if in that routine you need to multiply the accumulator by, say 12, it has to be stored in a 16-bit pair register. - but you can multiply a by 4 before overflowing (63*4 = 252 which is smaller than 255) and take advantage of this to optimize
Now on the code:
; The most usual way is pass A (the accumulator) right in the start to HL ld h,0 ld l,a add a,a ld d,h ld e,a add hl,de add hl,hl add hl,hl ; hl=a*12 ; 9 bytes, 56 clocks ; But given a is between 0 and 63 you can multiply by 4 without overflowing the 8-bit limit (255) add a,a add a,a ; a*4 ld l,a ld e,a ld h,0 ld d,h ; hl=a*4 and de=a*4 add hl,hl ; hl=a*8 add hl,de ; hl=a*12 ; 9 bytes, 49 clocks ; Although this specific case could be even better as follows: ld l,a add a,a ; a*2 add a,l ; a*3 ld h,0 ld l,a ; hl=a*3 add hl,hl ; hl=a*6 add hl,hl ; hl=a*12 ; 8 bytes, 45 clocks
In this example you both shaved a few clock cycles and saved some bytes, too. You can do this for other registers than A accumulator.
For example if passed in l and l is always lower than 64, you can do " sla l \ sla l \ ld h,0 " to multiply l by four and use hl for 16-bit operations. In this case you are exchanging size with speed increase. Each sla instruction is 2 bytes and add hl,hl is only 1 byte.
Mind this optimizations can produce bugs and somewhat hard code to follow, so comment them. I recommend to proceed to this optimization only when you really need speed and the code is bug free.
One common trick with multiplication by 256 is just load around the low byte register to the high byte register. This works because in binary a multiplication by 256 is like shifting 8 bits left, entering zeros. Examples:
; multiply a by 256 and store in hl ld h,a ld l,0 ; multiply hl by 256 and store in ade (pseudo 24-bit pair register) ld a,h ld d,l ld e,0
If you are out of registers, try using ixh/ixl/iyh/iyl and even the i register for loop counters instead of maintaining a counter in memory or pushing/popping an already used register to the stack inside a loop. Using ixh/ixl/iyh/iyl will break compatibility with the TI-84+SE emulated by the Nspire. You can only use i register for other purposes if you disable interrupts first (di).
In some rare cases, when you run out of registers and cannot to either refactor your algorithm(s) or to rely on RAM storage you may want to use the shadow registers : af', bc', de' and hl'
These registers behave like their "standard" counterparts (af, bc, de, hl) and you can swap the two register sets at using the following instructions :
ex af, af' ; swaps af and af' as the mnemonic indicates exx ; swaps bc, de, hl and bc', de', hl'
Shadow registers are somewhat common for doing arithmetic operations on some big integers (16-bit to 32-bit) or BCD operations without rely on RAM storage or pushing and popping to the stack. Example:
MUL32: DI AND A ; RESET CARRY FLAG SBC HL,HL ; LOWER RESULT = 0 EXX SBC HL,HL ; HIGHER RESULT = 0 LD A,B ; MPR IS AC'BC LD B,32 ; INITIALIZE LOOP COUNTER MUL32LOOP: SRA A ; RIGHT SHIFT MPR RR C EXX RR B RR C ; LOWEST BIT INTO CARRY JR NC,MUL32NOADD ADD HL,DE ; RESULT += MPD EXX ADC HL,DE EXX MUL32NOADD: SLA E ; LEFT SHIFT MPD RL D EXX RL E RL D DJNZ MUL32LOOP EXX ; RESULT IN H'L'HL RET
Shadow registers can be of a great help but they come with two drawbacks :
- they cannot coexist with the "standard" registers : you cannot use ld to assign from a standard to a shadow or vice-versa. Instead you must use nasty constructs such as :
; loads hl' with the contents of hl push hl exx pop hl
- they require interrupts to be disabled since they are originally intended for use in Interrupt Service Routine. There are situations where it is affordable and others where it isn't. Regardless, it is generally a good policy to restore the previous interrupt status (enabled/disabled) upon return instead of letting it up to the caller. Hopefully it s relatively easy to do (though it does add 4 bytes and 29/33 T-states to the routine) :
ld a, i ; this is the core of the trick, it sets P/V to the value of IFF so P/V is set iff interrupts were enabled at that point push af ; save flags di ; disable interrupts ; do something with shadow registers here pop af ; get back flags ret po ; po = P/V reset so in this case it means interrupts were disabled before the routine was called ei ; re-enable interrupts ret
- Note that this produces ugly and very hard code to follow, so comment it very well for understanding and debugging later.
This register is used in desperate situations generally during an interrupt loop demanding as much speed as possible and the normal registers are used. (remarkably used in James Montelongo 4 lvl grayscale interlace in graylib2.inc) You need to know these valid and not generally known instructions:
ld sp,6 add hl,sp sbc hl,sp inc sp dec sp
Now an example of such situation:
ld (saveSP),sp ;init hl,de,bc,a ld sp,6 loop: ;code add hl,sp ;get next row of a table for example ;code using bc,de,ix,a ld a,b or c jp nz,loop: ;code ld sp,(saveSP) ret ;finish interrupt
When you use sp in this way this means you can not push/pop registers and no calls are allowed. Mind again that this is only used as last resource. Don't forget to save and restore sp like the example shows.
When you run out of registers, stack may offer an interesting alternative to fixed RAM location for temporary storage.
You can either allocate stack space with repeated push, which allows to initialize the data but restricts the allocated space to multiples of 2. An alternate way is to allocate uninitialized stack space (hl may be replaced with an index register) :
; allocates 7 bytes of stack space : 5 bytes, 27 T-states instead of 4 bytes, 44 T-states with 4 push which would have forced the alloc of 8 bytes ld hl, -7 add hl, sp ld sp, hl
The most common way of accessing data allocated on stack is to use an index register since all allocated "variables" can be accessed without having to use inc/dec but this is obviously not a strict requirement. Beware though, using stack space is not always optimal in terms of speed, depending (among other things) on your register allocation strategy :
; 4 bytes, 19 T-states ld c, (ix + n) ; n is an immediate value in -128..127 ; 4 bytes, 17 T-states, destroys a ld a, (somelocation) ld c, a
If your needs go beyond simple load/store however, this method start to show its real power since it vastly simplify some operations that are complicated to do with fixed storage location (and generally screw up register in the process).
; 3 bytes, 19 T-states cp (ix + n) sub (ix + n) sbc a, (ix + n) add a, (ix + n) adc a, (ix + n) inc (ix + n) dec (ix + n) and (ix + n) or (ix + n) xor (ix + n) ; 4 bytes, 23 T-states rl (ix + n) rr (ix + n) rlc (ix + n) rrc (ix + n) sla (ix + n) sra (ix + n) sll (ix + n) srl (ix + n) bit k, (ix + n) ; k is an immediate value in 0..7 set k, (ix + n) res k, (ix + n)
Again, choose wisely between hl and an index register depending on the structure of your data the smallest/fastest allocation solution may vary (hl equivalent instructions are generally 2 bytes smaller and 12 T-states faster but do not allow indexing so may require intermediate inc/dec).
If you want need to pop an entry from the stack but need to preserve all registers remember that sp can be incremented/decremented like any 16bit register :
; drops the top stack entry : waste 1 byte and 2 T-states but may enable better register allocation... inc sp inc sp
If you have a large amount of stack space to drop and a spare 16 bit register (hl, index, or de that you can easily swap with hl) :
; drop 16 bytes of stack space : 5 bytes, 27 T-states instead of 8 bytes, 80 T-states for 8 pop ld hl, 16 add hl, sp ld sp, hl
The larger the space to drop the more T-states you will save, and at some point you'll start saving space as well (beyond 8 bytes)
Registers and Memory use is very important in writing concise and fast z80 code. Then comes the general optimization.
First, try to optimize the more used code in subroutines and large loops. Finding the bottleneck and solving it, is enough to many programs.
Do not forget that in z80 assembly vector tables (or look up tables) gives smaller and faster code than blocks of comparisons and jumps. Other times using a chunk of data for a task is better than a more usual programming method (notably in graphics screen effects). See Z80 Good Programming Practices for examples.
Look up in a complete instruction set for searching some instruction that can optimize somewhere in the code.
A list of things to keep in mind:
- Rework conditionals to be more efficient.
- Make sure the most common checks come first. Or said in other way, the more special and rare cases check in last.
- Get out of the main loop special cases check if they aren't needed there.
- Rearrange program flow
- When possible, if you can afford to have a bigger overhead and get code out of the main loop do it.
- When your code seems that even with optimization won't be efficient enough, try another approach or algorithm. Search other algorithms in Wikipedia, for instance.
- Rewriting code from scratch can bring new ideas (use in desperate situations because of all work needed to write it)
- Remember almost all times is better to leave optimization to the end. Optimization can bring too early headaches with crashes and debugging. And because ASM is very fast and sometimes even smaller than higher level languages, it may not be needed further optimization.
- Document wacky optimizations to understand the code later (z80 optimization leads to very hard code to understand)
Self Modifying Code
If your code is in ram, writes can be done to change the code. Having a instruction set that explains the opcodes is useful. Despite the self modifying code can be used in any instruction, it is very common with loading constants to registers.
Generally it is used to save any value to be used later (usually seen in masks). Examples:
ld (savemask),a ;...code... savemask = $+1 ld a,$00 ; $00 is just a placeholder ld (something),hl ;... code something = $+1 ld de,$0000 ld (saveSP),sp ;... code ... saveSP = $+1 ld sp,$0000 ; restore sp
SMC (Self Modifying Code) is quite used with unrolling and relative jumps. Example:
ld (jpmodify),a ;... jpmodify = $+1 jr $00 rrca rrca rrca rrca rrca rrca rrca rrca
Another SMC is modifying load instructions with (ix+0) and change the 0 to other values to really quickly read and write to the nth element of a list without using any extra registers.
Note that the following tricks act much like a peep-hole optimizer and are the last optimization step : remember to first optimize your algorithm and register allocation before applying any of the following if you really want the fastest speed and the smallest code.
Also note that near every trick turn the code less understandable and documenting them is a good idea. You can easily forgot after a while without reading parts of the code.
Be warned that some tricks are not exactly equivalent to the normal way and may have exceptions on its use, comments warn about them. Some tricks apply to other cases, but again you have to be careful.
There are some tricks that are nothing more than the correct use of the available instructions on the z80. Keeping an instruction set summary, help to visualize what you can do during coding.
Optimize size and speed
;Instead of: ld a,0 ;Try this: xor a ;disadvantages: changes flags ;or sub a ;disadvantages: changes flags ; -> save 1 byte and 3 T-states
;Instead of ld b,$20 ld c,$30 ;try this ld bc,$2030 ;or this ld bc,(b_num * 256) + c_num ;where b_num goes to b register and c_num to c register ; -> save 1 byte and 4 T-states
;Instead of ld a,$42 ld (hl),a ;try this ld (hl),$42 ; -> save 1 byte and 4 T-states
;Instead of xor a ld (data1),a ld (data2),a ld (data3),a ld (data4),a ld (data5),a ;if data1 to data5 are one after the other ;try this ld hl,data1 ld de,data1+1 xor a ld (hl),a ld bc,4 ldir ; -> save 3 bytes for every ld (dataX), after passing the initial overhead
;Instead of ld a,(var) inc a ld (var),a ;try this ;Note: if hl is not tied up, use indirection: ld hl,var inc (hl) ld a,(hl) ;if you don't need (hl) in a, delete this line ; -> save 2 bytes and 2 T-states
; Instead of : ld a, (hl) ld (de), a inc hl inc de ; Use : ldi inc bc ; -> save 1 byte and 4 T-states
;Never use: push BC ; ... pop BC ld D,B ld E,C ;Use instead: push BC ; ... pop DE ;we only want to DE hold pushed BC (no need for a copy of DE in BC) ; -> save 2 bytes and 8 T-states
Math and Logic tricks
;Instead of: cp 0 ;Use or a ; -> save 1 byte and 3 T-states
cp 1 ; > dec a ;changes a! ; -> save 1 byte and 3 T-states
xor %11111111 ; > cpl ; -> save 1 byte and 3 T-states
;Instead of ld de,767 or a ;reset carry so sbc works as a sub sbc hl,de ;try this ld de,-767 ;negation of de add hl,de ; -> 2 bytes and 8 T-states !
;Instead of ld de,-767 add hl,de ;try this dec h ; -256 dec h ; -512 dec h ; -768 inc hl ; -767 ;Note that works in many other cases ; -> save 3 T-states
;Instead of srl a srl a srl a ;try this rrca rrca rrca and %00011111 ; -> save 1 byte and 5 T-states
;Instead of neg add a,N ;you want to calculate N-A ;Do it this way: cpl add a,N+1 ;neg is practically equivalent to cpl \ inc a ; -> save 1 byte and 4 T-states
;Never use: ld A,B neg ;Instead use: xor A sub B ; -> save 1 byte and 4 T-states
;Never use: ld A,D sub $D3 neg ;Instead use: ld A,$D3 sub D ; -> save 2 bytes and 8 T-states
sla l rl h ; I've actually seen this! ; > add hl,hl ; -> save 3 bytes and 5 T-states
and 1 cp 1 jr z,foo ; > and 1 ;and sets zero flag, no need for cp jr nz,foo ; -> save 2 bytes and 7 T-states
and 1 cp 1 ;a not needed after this jr z,foo ; > rra jr c,foo
bit 0,a call z,foo ; > rra call nc,foo
bit 7,a jr z,foo ; > rla jr nc,foo
bit 2,a ret nz xor a ; > and %100 ret nz
; Instead of: cp 9 ;if a<=9 then goto label jp c,label jp z,label ; Use this: cp 9+1 ;if a<10 then goto label jp c,label ; -> save 3 bytes and 10 T-states
Almost never call and return...
;Instead of call xxxx ret ;try this jp xxxx ;only do this if the pushed pc to stack is not passed to the call. Example: some kind of inline vputs. ; -> save 1 byte and 17 T-states
;Never use: dec B jr NZ,loop ;I have seen this... ;Use: djnz loop ; save 1 byte and 3 T-states
Look up Table
; Instead of ld a,(Number) cp 0 jp z,A_is_0 cp 1 jp z,A_is_1 cp 2 jp z,A_is_2 cp 3 jp z,A_is_3 cp 4 jp z,A_is_4 cp 5 jp z,A_is_5 ; This is a little better ld a,(Number) or a jp z,A_is_0 dec a jp z,A_is_1 dec a jp z,A_is_2 dec a jp z,A_is_3 dec a jp z,A_is_4 dec a jp z,A_is_5 ; Even better ld a,(Number) add a,a ; a*2 (limits Number to 128) ld h,0 ld l,a ld de,VectorTable add hl,de ld a,(hl) inc hl ld h,(hl) ld l,a jp (hl) VectorTable: .dw A_is_1 .dw A_is_2 .dw A_is_3 .dw A_is_4 .dw A_is_5 ; Best ld a,(Number) add a,a ; a*2 (limits Number to 128) add a,VectorTable%256 ld l,a adc a,VectorTable/256 sub l ld h,a ld a,(hl) inc hl ld h,(hl) ld l,a jp (hl) VectorTable: .dw A_is_1 .dw A_is_2 .dw A_is_3 .dw A_is_4 .dw A_is_5
Also see Z80 Good Programming Practices
Fallthrough looping If you need to repeat a routine several times but can't spare registers for a loop counter or unroll the routine, try structuring the routine so it can call itself several times and fall through at the end. For example:
foo: ld hl, data call bar ; Run routine once call bar ; .. twice call bar ; .. three times bar: ld a, (hl) ; .. fourth and final time inc l and $0F out (c), a ret
Although this specific case would be even better (same size but shorter) as follows:
foo: ld hl, data call bar2 ; Run routine four times bar2: call bar ; Run routine twice bar: ld a, (hl) ; Run routine once inc l and $0F out (c), a ret
Toggling values in loops.
;Instead of loop: ld a,2 ;code1 ld a,0 ;code2 djnz loop ;try this ld a,2 loop: ;code1 xor $01 ; the trick is xor logic make a register alternate between two values ;code2 djnz loop ; -> save size and time depending on its use
- Table alignment
If you align tables to a 256-byte boundary, you can access the contents by placing the index in a register such as l and the table address in h. This is faster than loading the full unaligned 16-bit address and adding a 16-bit index to it, and makes accessing tables with a size of 256 bytes or less very convenient:
ld h, (sineTable >> 8) & $FF ; Get MSB of table ld a, (frame_count) ; Get index ld l, a ld a, (hl) ; Look up value
ld hl, sineTable ; Get address of table xor a ld d, a ; Set index high byte to zero ld a, (frame_count) ld e, a ; Set index low byte add hl, de ; Add offset to base ld a, (hl) ; Look up value
Size vs. Speed
The classical problem of optimization in computer programming, Z80 is no exception. In ASM most frequently size is what matters because generally ASM is fast enough and it is nice to give a user a smaller program that doesn't use up most RAM memory.
For the sake of size
- Use relative jumps (jr label) whenever possible. When relative jump is out of reach (out of -128 to 127 bytes) and there is a jp near, do a relative jump to the absolute one. Example:
;lots of code (more that 128 bytes worth of code) somelabel2: jp somelabel ;less than 128 bytes jr somelabel2 ;instead of a absolute jump directly to somelabel, jump to a jump to somelabel.
- Relative jumps are 2 bytes and absolute jumps 3. In terms of speed jp is faster when a jump occurs (10 T-states) and jr is faster when it doesn't occur.
;Instead of dec bc ld a,b or c ret z ;try this cpi ;increments HL ret po ; save 1 byte at the cost of 2 T-states
Passing inline data
When you call, the pc + 3 (after the call) is pushed. You can pop it and use as a pointer to data. A very nifty use is with strings. To return, pass the data and jp (hl).
Instead of: ld hl,string bcall(_vputs) ret ;Try this: call Disp .db "This is some text",0 ret ;Not a speed optimization, but it eliminates 2-byte pointers, since it just uses the call's return address. ;It also heavily disturbs disassembly. Disp: pop hl bcall(_vputs) jp (hl) ; -> save 2 bytes for each use, but 4 bytes of overhead (Disp routine)
This routine can be expanded to pass the coordinates where the text should appear.
Wasting time to delay
There are those funny times that you need some delay between operations like reads/writes to ports and there is nothing useful to do. And because nop's are not very size friendly, think of other slower but smaller instructions. Example:
;Instead of ld a,KEY_GROUP out (1),a nop nop in a,(1) ;Try this: ld a,KEY_GROUP out (1),a ld a,(de) ;a doesn't need to be preserved because it will hold what the port has. in a,(1) ; -> save 1 byte and 1 T-state (well 1 T-state less is almost the same time)
When you need to delay and cannot afford to alter registers or flags there are still ways to delay that waste less size than nop's :
; 2 bytes, 8 T-states nop nop ; 2 bytes, 12 T-states inc hl dec hl ; 2 bytes, 12 T-states jr $+2 ; 2 bytes, 21 T-states push af pop af ; 2 bytes, 38 T-states ex (sp), hl ex (sp), hl
If you need a small adjustable delay:
;4 bytes, b*13+8 T-states (variable) ld b,255 ; initial delay djnz $ ; do it ;b=0 on exit
- There are many other instructions that you can use
- Beware that not all instructions preserve registers or flags
- For delay between frames of games or other longer delays, you can use the 'halt' instruction if there are interrupts enabled. It make the calculator enter low power mode until an interrupt is triggered. To fine-tune the effect of this delay mechanism you can alter interrupt mask and interrupt time speed beforehand (and possibly restore their values afterwards).
General Unrolling You can unroll some loop several times instead of looping, this is used frequently on math routines of multiplication. This means you are wasting memory to gain speed. Most times you are preferring size to speed.
; "Classic" way : ~21 T-states per byte copied ld hl,src ld de,dest ld bc,size ldir ; Unrolled : (16 * size + 10) / n -> ~18 T-states per byte copied when unrolling 8 times ld hl,src ld de,dest ld bc,size ; if the size is not a multiple of the number of unrolled ldi then a small trick must be used to jump appropriately inside the loop for the first iteration loopldi: ;you can use this entry for a call ldi ldi ldi ldi ldi ldi ldi ldi jp pe, loopldi ; jp used as it is faster and in the case of a loop unrolling we assume speed matters more than size ; ret if this is a subroutine and use the unrolled ldi's with a call.
This unroll of ldi also works with outi and ldr.
Looping with 16 bit counter
There are two ways to make loops with a 16bit counter :
- the naive one, which results in smaller code but increased loop overhead (24 * n T-states) and destroys a
ld bc, ... loop: ; loop body here dec bc ld a, b or c jp nz,loop
- the slightly trickier one, which takes a couple more bytes but has a much lower overhead (12 * n + 14 * (n / 16) T-states)
dec de ld b, e inc b inc d loop2: ; loop body here djnz loop2 dec d jp nz,loop2
The rationale behind the second method is to reduce the overhead of the "inner" loop as much as possible and to use the fact that when b gets down to zero it will be treated as 256 by djnz.
You can therefore use the following macros for setting proper values of 8bit loop counters given a 16bit counter in case you want to do the conversion at compile time :
#define inner_counter8(counter16) (((counter16) - 1) & 0xff) + 1 #define outer_counter8(counter16) (((counter16) - 1) >> 8) + 1
; description: both routines compare b to 0, same size and speed but the second preserves accumulator ; remarks: - inc/dec doesn't affect carry flag ; - inc/dec doesn't affect any flags on 16-bit registers, so do not extrapolate to 16-bit registers. ld a,b or b jr z,label ; > inc b dec b jr z,label
; description: add a to hl without using a 16-bit register ;normal way: ld d,$00 ld e,a add hl,de ;4 bytes and 22 clock cycles ; > add a,l ld l,a jr nc, $+3 inc h ;5 bytes, 19/20 clock cycles
In some occasion you might want to selectively set/reset a flag.
Here are the most common uses :
; set Carry flag scf ; reset Carry flag (alters Sign and Zero flags as defined) or a ; alternate reset Carry flag (alters Sign and Zero flags as defined) and a ; set Zero flag (resets Carry flag, alters Sign flag as defined) cp a ; reset Zero flag (alters a, reset Carry flag, alters Sign flag as defined) or 1 ; set Sign flag (negative) (alters a, reset Zero and Carry flags) or $80 ; reset Sign flag (positive) (set a to zero, set Zero flag, reset Carry flag) xor a
Other possible uses (much rarer) :
;Set parity/overflow (even): xor a ;Reset parity/overflow (odd): sub a ;Set half carry (hardly ever useful but still...) and a ;Reset half carry (hardly ever useful but still...) or a ;Set bit 5 of f: or %00100000
As you can see these are extremely simple, small and fast ways to alter flags which make them interesting as output of routines to indicate error/success or other status bits that do not require a full register.
Were you to use this, remember that these flag (re)setting tricks frequently overlap so if you need a special combination of flags it might require slightly more elaborate tricks. As a rule of a thumb, always alter the carry last in such cases because the scf and ccf instructions do not have side effects.
More advance ways of manipulating flags follow:
;get the zero flag in carry scf jr z,$+3 ccf ;Put carry flag into zero flag. ccf sbc a, a
Tools of the job
Want to try test your optimization or test new ones? Then you have to check this:
- Keep a z80 instruction set to not forget a useful instruction and flags affected. (see Z80_Instruction_Set)
- Use an assembler that has ".echo" directive and use this in the source to count size: (see Assemblers)
SomeCodeorData: ;code or data goes here End: .echo "size of the code/data:" .echo End-SomeCodeorData
- Get a nice IDE of z80 that counts code (IDE's)
- Make use of the counting capabilities of an emulator (Emulators) (see wabbitemu)
Very specific optimizations (hardly practical)
Use an aligned address on memory such as $8000 (theoretical example) and if you will only use 256 bytes ($8000 to $80FF), to get the next byte use inc l instead of inc hl.
Crazy, "magick", hacks and obscure optimization's tricks
These are not normally recommend for use because some disturb disassembly and even coders understanding the code.
So you normally have an if-else-endif block like this:
jr nz,else ;the IF ;some code jr endif else: ;some code endif:
But here's a crazy trick for when the Else code is a single 2-byte instruction: You use the first byte of a 3 byte instruction with no side effects instead of the "jr endif" line! So if you had code like this:
cp 7 jr nz,else ld a,3 jr endif else: ld a,4 endif:
You could replace it with this:
cp 7 jr nz,else ld a,3 .db $C2 ;jp nz,xxxx else: ld a,4 endif:
Instead of branching over the ld a,4 instruction, it now executes a jp nz,XXXX instruction where the XXXX is the two bytes of the next instruction. You already know what the flags will be here, so you can make the jump never taken. You can use this to skip the next two bytes of execution! Who needs to branch over it?
This only takes 28 T-states for if. A small saving, but could be useful in tight loops, and saves 2 bytes! The only reason not to use this for 1-byte instructions would be code readability and bug safety. Watch those flags!
For a smaller conditional rst $38, use jr cc, -1. This will cause a conditional jump to the displacement byte ($FF) which is the rst $38 opcode.
Normally DAA instruction is used for BCD math but can be used for converting (?) ASCII integer.
cp 10 ccf adc a, 30h daa
- MaxCodez TI-ASM optimization
- ticalc archives: 1 2
- Balley Alley Z80 Machine Language Documentation
- Fast loops in MSX Assembly Page
- Shiar z80 optimization page
- SMS Power! dev wiki z80 Techniques
- Dwedit for sharing in MaxCoderz the "Better else"
- MaxCoderz participants in assembly optimizing topic (Jim e,CoBB,...)
- SMS Power wiki
- Einar Saukas