Talk:83Plus:BCALLs:4F00 - Revision history

Gambit at 20:37, 13 June 2006

2006-06-13T20:37:04Z

Dan Englender at 08:47, 11 June 2006

2006-06-11T08:47:06Z

Dan Englender: Category talk:83Plus:BCALLs:4F00 moved to Talk:83Plus:BCALLs:4F00

2006-06-11T08:44:10Z

Category talk:83Plus:BCALLs:4F00 moved to Talk:83Plus:BCALLs:4F00

Gambit: speculation

2006-06-10T21:58:16Z

speculation

New page

After disassembling some code, does it sound reasonable if this routine is like RecAByteIO (which appears to be bport only) but with code that handles the SE link-assist? [[User:Gambit|Gambit]] 14:58, 10 June 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 13 June 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	After disassembling some code, does it sound reasonable if this routine is like RecAByteIO (which appears to be bport only) but with code that handles the SE link-assist? [[User:Gambit\|Gambit]] 14:58, 10 June 2006 (PDT)		After disassembling some code, does it sound reasonable if this routine is like RecAByteIO (which appears to be bport only) but with code that handles the SE link-assist? [[User:Gambit\|Gambit]] 14:58, 10 June 2006 (PDT)
	:That seems surprising considering that the entry point existed on pre-SE calculators, but I haven't tried disassembling it yet to check. --[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 01:47, 11 June 2006 (PDT)		:That seems surprising considering that the entry point existed on pre-SE calculators, but I haven't tried disassembling it yet to check. --[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 01:47, 11 June 2006 (PDT)
		+	::Sorry about the Category mixup - I just changed the URL and didn't bother to look at the category bit.
		+	::Assuming I got the keystrokes right, I saw the code reading from [[83Plus:Ports:09\|port 09h]], and immediately assumed that the two were related somehow. Of course, I could be wrong, but I felt it was better to submit something than nothing :) ([[Wikipedia:WP:BB\|Be bold]]!) [[User:Gambit\|Gambit]] 13:37, 13 June 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:47, 11 June 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	After disassembling some code, does it sound reasonable if this routine is like RecAByteIO (which appears to be bport only) but with code that handles the SE link-assist? [[User:Gambit\|Gambit]] 14:58, 10 June 2006 (PDT)		After disassembling some code, does it sound reasonable if this routine is like RecAByteIO (which appears to be bport only) but with code that handles the SE link-assist? [[User:Gambit\|Gambit]] 14:58, 10 June 2006 (PDT)
		+	:That seems surprising considering that the entry point existed on pre-SE calculators, but I haven't tried disassembling it yet to check. --[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 01:47, 11 June 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:44, 11 June 2006
(No difference)