Talk:83Plus:Flags:05 - Revision history

AndyJ: +reply

2005-08-03T01:21:27Z

+reply

FloppusMaximus at 01:07, 3 August 2005

2005-08-03T01:07:33Z

Kalimero at 20:05, 2 August 2005

2005-08-02T20:05:59Z

AndyJ: blasted no wrapping

2005-08-02T03:45:08Z

blasted no wrapping

AndyJ at 03:44, 2 August 2005

2005-08-02T03:44:45Z

New page

In the case of PutMap, it changes the "gravity" of the pixels; displaying an inverted character darkens the pixels to the left of it, whereas displaying a normal character clears the pixels to the right.

Could you explain that a bit better? I'm having trouble grasping what you mean by that. --[[User:AndyJ|Andy Janata]] 20:44, 1 Aug 2005 (PDT)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Could you explain that a bit better? I'm having trouble grasping what you mean by that. --[[User:AndyJ|Andy Janata]] 20:44, 1 Aug 2005 (PDT)
 :I think he means the black vertical bar on the left of a character when you display it using inverse video and then overwrite it again using normal video. So when you use inverse video, the character background is shifted one pixel to the left compared to using normal video. If you'd display an inverted character and then display a normal character to the left of it a line of black pixels will be cleared. At least, that's what I think he meant to say. --[[User:Kalimero|Kalimero]] 13:05, 2 Aug 2005 (PDT)
-:Right, the affected pixel columns are different.  Try drawing a few characters and you can see what I mean.  The character itself is always displayed in the same place, though.  If you can describe it more clearly, feel free to do so. --[[User:FloppusMaximus|FloppusMaximus]] 18:07, 2 Aug 2005 (PDT)
+::Right, the affected pixel columns are different.  Try drawing a few characters and you can see what I mean.  The character itself is always displayed in the same place, though.  If you can describe it more clearly, feel free to do so. --[[User:FloppusMaximus|FloppusMaximus]] 18:07, 2 Aug 2005 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 3 August 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Could you explain that a bit better? I'm having trouble grasping what you mean by that. --[[User:AndyJ\|Andy Janata]] 20:44, 1 Aug 2005 (PDT)		Could you explain that a bit better? I'm having trouble grasping what you mean by that. --[[User:AndyJ\|Andy Janata]] 20:44, 1 Aug 2005 (PDT)
	:I think he means the black vertical bar on the left of a character when you display it using inverse video and then overwrite it again using normal video. So when you use inverse video, the character background is shifted one pixel to the left compared to using normal video. If you'd display an inverted character and then display a normal character to the left of it a line of black pixels will be cleared. At least, that's what I think he meant to say. --[[User:Kalimero\|Kalimero]] 13:05, 2 Aug 2005 (PDT)		:I think he means the black vertical bar on the left of a character when you display it using inverse video and then overwrite it again using normal video. So when you use inverse video, the character background is shifted one pixel to the left compared to using normal video. If you'd display an inverted character and then display a normal character to the left of it a line of black pixels will be cleared. At least, that's what I think he meant to say. --[[User:Kalimero\|Kalimero]] 13:05, 2 Aug 2005 (PDT)
		+	:Right, the affected pixel columns are different. Try drawing a few characters and you can see what I mean. The character itself is always displayed in the same place, though. If you can describe it more clearly, feel free to do so. --[[User:FloppusMaximus\|FloppusMaximus]] 18:07, 2 Aug 2005 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 2 August 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Could you explain that a bit better? I'm having trouble grasping what you mean by that. --[[User:AndyJ\|Andy Janata]] 20:44, 1 Aug 2005 (PDT)		Could you explain that a bit better? I'm having trouble grasping what you mean by that. --[[User:AndyJ\|Andy Janata]] 20:44, 1 Aug 2005 (PDT)
		+	:I think he means the black vertical bar on the left of a character when you display it using inverse video and then overwrite it again using normal video. So when you use inverse video, the character background is shifted one pixel to the left compared to using normal video. If you'd display an inverted character and then display a normal character to the left of it a line of black pixels will be cleared. At least, that's what I think he meant to say. --[[User:Kalimero\|Kalimero]] 13:05, 2 Aug 2005 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:45, 2 August 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	In the case of PutMap, it changes the "gravity" of the pixels; displaying an inverted character darkens the pixels to the left of it, whereas displaying a normal character clears the pixels to the right.	+	In the case of PutMap, it changes the "gravity" of the pixels; displaying an inverted
		+	character darkens the pixels to the left of it, whereas displaying a normal character
		+	clears the pixels to the right.

	Could you explain that a bit better? I'm having trouble grasping what you mean by that. --[[User:AndyJ\|Andy Janata]] 20:44, 1 Aug 2005 (PDT)		Could you explain that a bit better? I'm having trouble grasping what you mean by that. --[[User:AndyJ\|Andy Janata]] 20:44, 1 Aug 2005 (PDT)