Talk:83Plus:Hooks:9B88 - Revision history

Mmartin at 09:30, 28 March 2005

2005-03-28T09:30:28Z

FloppusMaximus at 09:18, 28 March 2005

2005-03-28T09:18:04Z

Mmartin at 09:06, 28 March 2005

2005-03-28T09:06:20Z

FloppusMaximus at 08:55, 28 March 2005

2005-03-28T08:55:29Z

Mmartin at 08:50, 28 March 2005

2005-03-28T08:50:47Z

New page

This hook doesn't work when you only use getcsc calls, it only works inside the GetKey B_CALL. Thus I think the name getcschook is more confusing than the name getkeyhook. The hook is called everytime the os detects a keypress during the getcschook, but before the Raw Key Hook is called and it's also called when keys like 2nd or alpha are pressed.

[[User:Mmartin|Mmartin]] 00:50, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:30, 28 March 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:::You're right. How's this? [[User:FloppusMaximus\|FloppusMaximus]] 01:18, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)		:::You're right. How's this? [[User:FloppusMaximus\|FloppusMaximus]] 01:18, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
		+
		+	::::Looks good, let's keep it this way unless someway finds a better name. [[User:Mmartin\|Mmartin]] 01:30, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:18, 28 March 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::No, but calling it the GetCSC hook without specifically mentioning that it doesn't work when you call getcsc is also very confusing. Thus I think that the hook should either be renamed or it should specifically mention that it has nothing to do with the GetCSC B_CALL. [[User:Mmartin\|Mmartin]] 01:06, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)		::No, but calling it the GetCSC hook without specifically mentioning that it doesn't work when you call getcsc is also very confusing. Thus I think that the hook should either be renamed or it should specifically mention that it has nothing to do with the GetCSC B_CALL. [[User:Mmartin\|Mmartin]] 01:06, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
		+
		+	:::You're right. How's this? [[User:FloppusMaximus\|FloppusMaximus]] 01:18, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:06, 28 March 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:That's true... but calling it the 'GetKeyHook' has already been shown to confuse people. We've certainly had enough ''bad'' names proposed for both of them: can you think of one that won't cause any confusion? [[User:FloppusMaximus\|FloppusMaximus]] 00:55, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)		:That's true... but calling it the 'GetKeyHook' has already been shown to confuse people. We've certainly had enough ''bad'' names proposed for both of them: can you think of one that won't cause any confusion? [[User:FloppusMaximus\|FloppusMaximus]] 00:55, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
		+
		+	::No, but calling it the GetCSC hook without specifically mentioning that it doesn't work when you call getcsc is also very confusing. Thus I think that the hook should either be renamed or it should specifically mention that it has nothing to do with the GetCSC B_CALL. [[User:Mmartin\|Mmartin]] 01:06, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:55, 28 March 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Mmartin\|Mmartin]] 00:50, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)		[[User:Mmartin\|Mmartin]] 00:50, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
		+
		+	:That's true... but calling it the 'GetKeyHook' has already been shown to confuse people. We've certainly had enough ''bad'' names proposed for both of them: can you think of one that won't cause any confusion? [[User:FloppusMaximus\|FloppusMaximus]] 00:55, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)