Talk:Contributing - Revision history

Galandros: /* Needs work */

2009-10-25T09:17:54Z

‎Needs work

2009-10-25T09:16:15Z

2009-10-25T09:15:13Z

‎Needs work: new section

2006-03-21T19:13:55Z

to-do list

2005-04-28T22:56:11Z

2005-04-28T21:30:25Z

2005-03-28T23:57:59Z

2005-03-28T23:56:42Z

2005-03-28T22:23:05Z

2005-03-28T22:22:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 25 October 2009
Line 50:		Line 50:
	That's I though for now.		That's I though for now.

−	--[[User:Galandros\|Galandros]] 9:13, 25 October 2009 (~~PST~~)	+	--[[User:Galandros\|Galandros]] 9:13, 25 October 2009 (GMT)

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 == Needs work ==
 Add a brief to do list.
 Add a link to the wanted pages
@@ Line 51: / Line 49: @@
 That's I though for now.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:15, 25 October 2009
Line 42:		Line 42:
	* Organize/clean up so it's not as scary to a newbie		* Organize/clean up so it's not as scary to a newbie
	--[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 11:13, 21 March 2006 (PST)		--[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 11:13, 21 March 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	== Needs work ==
		+
		+
		+	Add a brief to do list.
		+	Add a link to the wanted pages
		+	Add a link to recent talk (maybe?)
		+
		+	That's I though for now.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 21 March 2006
Line 35:		Line 35:

	:"Page" is already in common use for a 16KB section of RAM or flash that can be paged in, so we shouldn't change that. Af far as formatting: oh well. All of us use different assemblers, and we just need to live with it, I think. --[[User:JasonM\|JasonM]] 15:56, 28 Apr 2005 (PDT)		:"Page" is already in common use for a 16KB section of RAM or flash that can be paged in, so we shouldn't change that. Af far as formatting: oh well. All of us use different assemblers, and we just need to live with it, I think. --[[User:JasonM\|JasonM]] 15:56, 28 Apr 2005 (PDT)
		+
		+	----
		+	To do list for this page:
		+	* Add info on creating an account and email confirmation
		+	* Add links to wanted/stub/missinginfo/etc lists
		+	* Organize/clean up so it's not as scary to a newbie
		+	--[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 11:13, 21 March 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 28 April 2005
Line 33:		Line 33:
	There is also no standard for how code should be formatted. There are three articles in Z80 Routines, and all of them use a different assembler's syntax (bub_font: ZMASM, fastcopy: TASM, and itoa (arguably the finest of them all :-): WLA).		There is also no standard for how code should be formatted. There are three articles in Z80 Routines, and all of them use a different assembler's syntax (bub_font: ZMASM, fastcopy: TASM, and itoa (arguably the finest of them all :-): WLA).
	--[[User:Sigma\|Sigma]] 14:30, 28 Apr 2005 (PDT)		--[[User:Sigma\|Sigma]] 14:30, 28 Apr 2005 (PDT)
		+
		+	:"Page" is already in common use for a 16KB section of RAM or flash that can be paged in, so we shouldn't change that. Af far as formatting: oh well. All of us use different assemblers, and we just need to live with it, I think. --[[User:JasonM\|JasonM]] 15:56, 28 Apr 2005 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 28 April 2005
Line 24:		Line 24:
	----		----
	Ick, I did goof that up... I fixed it. --[[User:AndyJ\|AndyJ]] 15:57, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)		Ick, I did goof that up... I fixed it. --[[User:AndyJ\|AndyJ]] 15:57, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
		+
		+	----
		+	Would it be a good idea to use this nomenclature when talking about the calculator's memory?
		+	*"page" - 256 bytes of memory, usu. in the address range ??00..??FF.
		+	*"(memory) slot" - A division of logical memory used for memory banks (the TI-83 has four slots).
		+	*"(memory) bank" - An amount of physical memory that can be mapped in/out of logical memory through a memory slot.
		+
		+	There is also no standard for how code should be formatted. There are three articles in Z80 Routines, and all of them use a different assembler's syntax (bub_font: ZMASM, fastcopy: TASM, and itoa (arguably the finest of them all :-): WLA).
		+	--[[User:Sigma\|Sigma]] 14:30, 28 Apr 2005 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:57, 28 March 2005
Line 21:		Line 21:

	--[[User:AndyJ\|AndyJ]] 15:56, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)		--[[User:AndyJ\|AndyJ]] 15:56, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
		+
		+	----
		+	Ick, I did goof that up... I fixed it. --[[User:AndyJ\|AndyJ]] 15:57, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 28 March 2005
Line 14:		Line 14:
	And then a third category listing for the by address listing.		And then a third category listing for the by address listing.
	--[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 14:22, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)		--[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 14:22, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
		+
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	That'd be <nowiki>[[Category:83Plus:BCALLs:By Name:Utility\|ProveTheRiemannHypothesis]]</nowiki>... runs off to check the template
		+
		+	--[[User:AndyJ\|AndyJ]] 15:56, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 28 March 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should romcalls be put into only the most specific category, or should they appear in the parent category as well?--[[User:Dwedit\|Dwedit]] 13:28, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)		Should romcalls be put into only the most specific category, or should they appear in the parent category as well?--[[User:Dwedit\|Dwedit]] 13:28, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
		+
		+	----
		+

	They should be placed into both. We want a list of all bcalls/romcalls, but it's also nice to be able to browse by more specific type. So, for example, you would have something like this (pasted from the template) -		They should be placed into both. We want a list of all bcalls/romcalls, but it's also nice to be able to browse by more specific type. So, for example, you would have something like this (pasted from the template) -

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 28 March 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should romcalls be put into only the most specific category, or should they appear in the parent category as well?--[[User:Dwedit\|Dwedit]] 13:28, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)		Should romcalls be put into only the most specific category, or should they appear in the parent category as well?--[[User:Dwedit\|Dwedit]] 13:28, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
		+
		+	They should be placed into both. We want a list of all bcalls/romcalls, but it's also nice to be able to browse by more specific type. So, for example, you would have something like this (pasted from the template) -
		+
		+	<nowiki>[[Category:83Plus:BCALLs:By Name\|ProveTheRiemannHypothesis]]</nowiki>
		+
		+	and also
		+
		+	<nowiki>[[Category:83Plus:BCALLs:By Name\|Utility\|ProveTheRiemannHypothesis]]</nowiki>
		+
		+	And then a third category listing for the by address listing.
		+	--[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 14:22, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)