Talk:History of the TI Z80 community - Revision history

Dwedit: /* This article is worthless without Bill Nagel */

2010-02-02T04:03:36Z

‎This article is worthless without Bill Nagel

2010-02-02T03:52:16Z

‎This article is worthless without Bill Nagel: new section

2009-12-19T22:00:22Z

‎Needing more content: suggested adding some events

2009-12-19T15:12:44Z

‎Needing more content: new section

2006-07-19T14:03:04Z

2006-07-19T14:02:40Z

2006-07-16T07:29:19Z

2006-07-16T06:40:17Z

2006-07-16T06:39:36Z

2006-07-16T02:09:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:03, 2 February 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	== This article is worthless without Bill Nagel ==		== This article is worthless without Bill Nagel ==

−	Bill Nagel used to be the god of the TI scene, having made ASHELL83, and other games.	+	Bill Nagel used to be the god of the TI scene, having made ASHELL83, and other games. --[[User:Dwedit\|Dwedit]] 04:03, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:52, 2 February 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:
	* Change of calculators popularity, exactly the transition between the TI-85/86 to TI-8x family. (variable in regions, vague and discussable)		* Change of calculators popularity, exactly the transition between the TI-85/86 to TI-8x family. (variable in regions, vague and discussable)
	[[User:Galandros\|Galandros]] 22:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)		[[User:Galandros\|Galandros]] 22:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== This article is worthless without Bill Nagel ==
		+
		+	Bill Nagel used to be the god of the TI scene, having made ASHELL83, and other games.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 19 December 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Or it should be somehow more complete?		Or it should be somehow more complete?
	It would be nice older members of the community complete this.		It would be nice older members of the community complete this.
		+
		+	Some events we could add:
		+	* end of POTM and start of POTY, that means a major decrease in calc stuff. (easy to get date from ticalc)
		+	* Change of calculators popularity, exactly the transition between the TI-85/86 to TI-8x family. (variable in regions, vague and discussable)
		+	[[User:Galandros\|Galandros]] 22:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:12, 19 December 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I've moved almost all DS-related stuff to [[Team:Detached Solutions]]. [[User:Guillaumeh\|Guillaumeh]] 00:29, 16 July 2006 (PDT)		I've moved almost all DS-related stuff to [[Team:Detached Solutions]]. [[User:Guillaumeh\|Guillaumeh]] 00:29, 16 July 2006 (PDT)
		+
		+	== Needing more content ==
		+
		+	What important events are we forgetting in this page? If any.
		+	Or it should be somehow more complete?
		+	It would be nice older members of the community complete this.

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 * This history goes farther back. I believe it all began with ti-files. Do we have any info on them? {{unsigned|Toksyuryel|17:23, 15 July 2006 (PDT)}}
- Oops, sorry about that. Could've sworn I signed it o.O [[User:Toksyuryel|Toksyuryel]] 07:02, 19 July 2006 (PDT)
+** Oops, sorry about that. Could've sworn I signed it o.O [[User:Toksyuryel|Toksyuryel]] 07:02, 19 July 2006 (PDT)
 I really don't think mentioning every single DS product is nessacry. the maybe well produced but They aren't alone in that. Some of them should be on the proof of concept page.  Anyway I think looking back at significant events woulds more helpful.--[[User:Jim e|Jim e]] 18:52, 15 July 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 19 July 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	* This history goes farther back. I believe it all began with ti-files. Do we have any info on them? {{unsigned\|Toksyuryel\|17:23, 15 July 2006 (PDT)}}		* This history goes farther back. I believe it all began with ti-files. Do we have any info on them? {{unsigned\|Toksyuryel\|17:23, 15 July 2006 (PDT)}}
		+
		+	Oops, sorry about that. Could've sworn I signed it o.O [[User:Toksyuryel\|Toksyuryel]] 07:02, 19 July 2006 (PDT)

	I really don't think mentioning every single DS product is nessacry. the maybe well produced but They aren't alone in that. Some of them should be on the proof of concept page. Anyway I think looking back at significant events woulds more helpful.--[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 18:52, 15 July 2006 (PDT)		I really don't think mentioning every single DS product is nessacry. the maybe well produced but They aren't alone in that. Some of them should be on the proof of concept page. Anyway I think looking back at significant events woulds more helpful.--[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 18:52, 15 July 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:29, 16 July 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I have to agree with Jim E here. This shouldn't be the history of Detached Solution. Something like "First Application Shell" would be possible, but the release of DAWG (even if it's a nice prog) is rather unimportant in the history of the community. --[[User:Kv83\|kv83]] 23:39, 15 July 2006 (PDT)		I have to agree with Jim E here. This shouldn't be the history of Detached Solution. Something like "First Application Shell" would be possible, but the release of DAWG (even if it's a nice prog) is rather unimportant in the history of the community. --[[User:Kv83\|kv83]] 23:39, 15 July 2006 (PDT)
		+
		+	I've moved almost all DS-related stuff to [[Team:Detached Solutions]]. [[User:Guillaumeh\|Guillaumeh]] 00:29, 16 July 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 16 July 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	I really don't think mentioning every single DS product is nessacry. the maybe well produced but They aren't alone in that. Some of them should be on the proof of concept page. Anyway I think looking back at significant events woulds more helpful.--[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 18:52, 15 July 2006 (PDT)		I really don't think mentioning every single DS product is nessacry. the maybe well produced but They aren't alone in that. Some of them should be on the proof of concept page. Anyway I think looking back at significant events woulds more helpful.--[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 18:52, 15 July 2006 (PDT)

−	I have to agree with Jim E here. This shouldn't be the history of Detached Solution. Something like "First Application Shell" would be possible, but the release of DAWG (~~as nice as~~ it ~~could be~~) is rather unimportant in the history of the community. --[[User:Kv83\|kv83]] 23:39, 15 July 2006 (PDT)	+	I have to agree with Jim E here. This shouldn't be the history of Detached Solution. Something like "First Application Shell" would be possible, but the release of DAWG (even if it's a nice prog) is rather unimportant in the history of the community. --[[User:Kv83\|kv83]] 23:39, 15 July 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:39, 16 July 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I really don't think mentioning every single DS product is nessacry. the maybe well produced but They aren't alone in that. Some of them should be on the proof of concept page. Anyway I think looking back at significant events woulds more helpful.--[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 18:52, 15 July 2006 (PDT)		I really don't think mentioning every single DS product is nessacry. the maybe well produced but They aren't alone in that. Some of them should be on the proof of concept page. Anyway I think looking back at significant events woulds more helpful.--[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 18:52, 15 July 2006 (PDT)
		+
		+	I have to agree with Jim E here. This shouldn't be the history of Detached Solution. Something like "First Application Shell" would be possible, but the release of DAWG (as nice as it could be) is rather unimportant in the history of the community. --[[User:Kv83\|kv83]] 23:39, 15 July 2006 (PDT)