Talk:Z80 Good Programming Practices - Revision history

Galandros: moved Talk:Good programming practices to Talk:Z80 Good Programming Practices: to not mistake with general programming

2010-04-20T20:25:54Z

moved Talk:Good programming practices to Talk:Z80 Good Programming Practices: to not mistake with general programming

Guillaumeh at 11:34, 18 February 2007

2007-02-18T11:34:55Z

Saibot84 at 09:00, 31 December 2006

2006-12-31T09:00:06Z

AndyJ at 04:01, 28 December 2006

2006-12-28T04:01:34Z

Jim e at 08:29, 27 December 2006

2006-12-27T08:29:47Z

Burntfuse at 18:30, 24 September 2006

2006-09-24T18:30:11Z

Dan Englender at 19:56, 20 September 2006

2006-09-20T19:56:12Z

Jim e: Note on this page

2006-09-20T19:20:05Z

Note on this page

New page

To be honest this article is questionable in its function, as "good practices" is relative per situation. The examples given are bad examples when to do what is suggested. Further there isn't much substance here and it's poorly defined what would belong here. A programming guide would be a better idea than this. --[[User:Jim e|Jim e]] 12:20, 20 September 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:34, 18 February 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::Anyone want to be in charge of making an AfD system? >_> <_< -[[User:AndyJ\|Andy Janata]] 20:01, 27 December 2006 (PST)		:::Anyone want to be in charge of making an AfD system? >_> <_< -[[User:AndyJ\|Andy Janata]] 20:01, 27 December 2006 (PST)
	::::I'm sorry to have to ask, but what is an AfD system? [[User:Saibot84\|Saibot84]] 01:00, 31 December 2006 (PST)		::::I'm sorry to have to ask, but what is an AfD system? [[User:Saibot84\|Saibot84]] 01:00, 31 December 2006 (PST)
		+	:::::AfD = [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion article for deletion] Well, if nobody find it useful, or can't do anything to make it useful, it's better to delete it. I've written the article in a [http://www.icw-net.com/info/services/rocksoup.htm rock soup] perspective (as often), it seems to have failed :) [[User:Guillaumeh\|Guillaumeh]] 03:34, 18 February 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:00, 31 December 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::I took out the ix think because it was VERY wrong, I don't know why I didn't notice it before. Opcodes were used that didn't exist, the situation for ix usage was poor and less optimized. Now without that there is only the LUT thing, I still think this page is pointless.--[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 00:29, 27 December 2006 (PST)		::I took out the ix think because it was VERY wrong, I don't know why I didn't notice it before. Opcodes were used that didn't exist, the situation for ix usage was poor and less optimized. Now without that there is only the LUT thing, I still think this page is pointless.--[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 00:29, 27 December 2006 (PST)
	:::Anyone want to be in charge of making an AfD system? >_> <_< -[[User:AndyJ\|Andy Janata]] 20:01, 27 December 2006 (PST)		:::Anyone want to be in charge of making an AfD system? >_> <_< -[[User:AndyJ\|Andy Janata]] 20:01, 27 December 2006 (PST)
		+	::::I'm sorry to have to ask, but what is an AfD system? [[User:Saibot84\|Saibot84]] 01:00, 31 December 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:01, 28 December 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::I took out the ix think because it was VERY wrong, I don't know why I didn't notice it before. Opcodes were used that didn't exist, the situation for ix usage was poor and less optimized. Now without that there is only the LUT thing, I still think this page is pointless.--[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 00:29, 27 December 2006 (PST)		::I took out the ix think because it was VERY wrong, I don't know why I didn't notice it before. Opcodes were used that didn't exist, the situation for ix usage was poor and less optimized. Now without that there is only the LUT thing, I still think this page is pointless.--[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 00:29, 27 December 2006 (PST)
		+	:::Anyone want to be in charge of making an AfD system? >_> <_< -[[User:AndyJ\|Andy Janata]] 20:01, 27 December 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:29, 27 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Well I agree that the title may be misleading, but I think that for the most part the content would be ok for a sort of "programming tips" section of a larger programming guide. In any case, feel free to add/change as you see fit. --[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 12:56, 20 September 2006 (PDT)		:Well I agree that the title may be misleading, but I think that for the most part the content would be ok for a sort of "programming tips" section of a larger programming guide. In any case, feel free to add/change as you see fit. --[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 12:56, 20 September 2006 (PDT)
	::Yeah, some of the stuff (like the section on lookup tables) should say when it's more efficient to use it and when it's not (with only a few options and sequential numbers, dec a / jp z,X / dec a / jp z,Y... would be more efficient), but the idea is good. --[[User:Burntfuse\|burntfuse]] 11:30, 24 September 2006 (PDT)		::Yeah, some of the stuff (like the section on lookup tables) should say when it's more efficient to use it and when it's not (with only a few options and sequential numbers, dec a / jp z,X / dec a / jp z,Y... would be more efficient), but the idea is good. --[[User:Burntfuse\|burntfuse]] 11:30, 24 September 2006 (PDT)
		+
		+	::I took out the ix think because it was VERY wrong, I don't know why I didn't notice it before. Opcodes were used that didn't exist, the situation for ix usage was poor and less optimized. Now without that there is only the LUT thing, I still think this page is pointless.--[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 00:29, 27 December 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 24 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	To be honest this article is questionable in its function, as "good practices" is relative per situation. The examples given are bad examples when to do what is suggested. Further there isn't much substance here and it's poorly defined what would belong here. A programming guide would be a better idea than this. --[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 12:20, 20 September 2006 (PDT)		To be honest this article is questionable in its function, as "good practices" is relative per situation. The examples given are bad examples when to do what is suggested. Further there isn't much substance here and it's poorly defined what would belong here. A programming guide would be a better idea than this. --[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 12:20, 20 September 2006 (PDT)
	:Well I agree that the title may be misleading, but I think that for the most part the content would be ok for a sort of "programming tips" section of a larger programming guide. In any case, feel free to add/change as you see fit. --[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 12:56, 20 September 2006 (PDT)		:Well I agree that the title may be misleading, but I think that for the most part the content would be ok for a sort of "programming tips" section of a larger programming guide. In any case, feel free to add/change as you see fit. --[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 12:56, 20 September 2006 (PDT)
		+	::Yeah, some of the stuff (like the section on lookup tables) should say when it's more efficient to use it and when it's not (with only a few options and sequential numbers, dec a / jp z,X / dec a / jp z,Y... would be more efficient), but the idea is good. --[[User:Burntfuse\|burntfuse]] 11:30, 24 September 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:25, 20 April 2010
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 20 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	To be honest this article is questionable in its function, as "good practices" is relative per situation. The examples given are bad examples when to do what is suggested. Further there isn't much substance here and it's poorly defined what would belong here. A programming guide would be a better idea than this. --[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 12:20, 20 September 2006 (PDT)		To be honest this article is questionable in its function, as "good practices" is relative per situation. The examples given are bad examples when to do what is suggested. Further there isn't much substance here and it's poorly defined what would belong here. A programming guide would be a better idea than this. --[[User:Jim e\|Jim e]] 12:20, 20 September 2006 (PDT)
		+	:Well I agree that the title may be misleading, but I think that for the most part the content would be ok for a sort of "programming tips" section of a larger programming guide. In any case, feel free to add/change as you see fit. --[[User:Dan Englender\|Dan Englender]] 12:56, 20 September 2006 (PDT)