Difference between revisions of "Talk:83Plus:BCALLs:4C93"
From WikiTI
84plusfreak (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Hmm, still, one would think TI would be overly safe and reset the subtimer too... --[[User:AndyJ|AndyJ]] 06:29, 4 May 2005 (PDT) | ::Hmm, still, one would think TI would be overly safe and reset the subtimer too... --[[User:AndyJ|AndyJ]] 06:29, 4 May 2005 (PDT) | ||
:::In that case I should probably mention that code from TIOS is copyrighted and should not be posted on the wiki. --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 18:09, 4 May 2005 (PDT) | :::In that case I should probably mention that code from TIOS is copyrighted and should not be posted on the wiki. --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 18:09, 4 May 2005 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I didn't take it directly from the OS. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Someone told me the OS does that. | ||
| + | |||
| + | By the way, you should create new articles instead of discussing about one or two seconds apd time. | ||
Revision as of 00:55, 6 May 2005
Resetting it yourself
Shouldn't you also reset the apdSubTimer if you're going to reset it yourself? Granted, that's only a second or two, but still... If you're going to say how you can do it yourself, you should get it right. :P --AndyJ 23:11, 3 May 2005 (PDT)
- If you read it, you know it says: 'The code is:' That means the following is the code taken from the TI-OS. -- 84plusfreak
- Hmm, still, one would think TI would be overly safe and reset the subtimer too... --AndyJ 06:29, 4 May 2005 (PDT)
- In that case I should probably mention that code from TIOS is copyrighted and should not be posted on the wiki. --Dan Englender 18:09, 4 May 2005 (PDT)
- Hmm, still, one would think TI would be overly safe and reset the subtimer too... --AndyJ 06:29, 4 May 2005 (PDT)
I didn't take it directly from the OS.
Someone told me the OS does that.
By the way, you should create new articles instead of discussing about one or two seconds apd time.
