Difference between revisions of "Talk:Z80 Instruction Set"
From WikiTI
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::Is providing an octal representation actually useful for anything? | ::Is providing an octal representation actually useful for anything? | ||
| − | + | :A binary representation would be more useful -- [[User:Jib|Jib]] | |
Revision as of 15:38, 25 December 2005
We could probably just use one of the publically available instruction set lists to save the time and trouble of typing everything out again. --Dan 00:28, 22 Dec 2005
- Emacs.
- Anyway, what you've got so far is not particularly clear, and doesn't really present the important information. I'm thinking of a series of tables something like this:
| Oct | Hex | Instruction | States | Clock | S | Z | X | H | Y | P | N | C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 40 | ld b, b | OCF(4) | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 101 | 41 | ld b, c | OCF(4) | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 102 | 42 | ld b, d | OCF(4) | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 103 | 43 | ld b, e | OCF(4) | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
- A quick reference for people who actually know what they're doing. For those who don't, these tables should of course be accompanied by detailed descriptions of what the various opcodes actually do.
- Any comments before I go and waste a few hours wikifying the rest of the Z80 instruction set?
- Please don't use parentheses for anything other than indirection!
- FloppusMaximus 12:28, 23 Dec 2005 (PST)
- Is providing an octal representation actually useful for anything?
- A binary representation would be more useful -- Jib
