Difference between revisions of "Talk:83Plus:Ports:2C"
From WikiTI
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | With regards to ports 2B and 2C, they really are intended I think for 20 and 25 MHz operation. | + | With regards to ports 2B and 2C, they really are intended I think for 20 and 25 MHz operation. Do we want to note this? |
| − | You see, the SE was originally going to be 6/15/20/25 MHz. That is why port 20h will also accept 2 and 3 as values. | + | You see, the SE was originally going to be 6/15/20/25 MHz. That is why port 20h will also accept 2 and 3 as values. TI dropped the faster speeds but the hardware is still somewhat in there. |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | - Michael | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm assuming that the only way we can achive 20 and 25 mhz is by physically modifing the calc. But I would perfer that as the naming scheme (plus note) then what I came up with. So I'd say yes.--[[User:Jim e|Jim e]] 07:00, 23 Aug 2005 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:00, 23 August 2005
With regards to ports 2B and 2C, they really are intended I think for 20 and 25 MHz operation. Do we want to note this?
You see, the SE was originally going to be 6/15/20/25 MHz. That is why port 20h will also accept 2 and 3 as values. TI dropped the faster speeds but the hardware is still somewhat in there.
- Michael
I'm assuming that the only way we can achive 20 and 25 mhz is by physically modifing the calc. But I would perfer that as the naming scheme (plus note) then what I came up with. So I'd say yes.--Jim e 07:00, 23 Aug 2005 (PDT)
