Difference between revisions of "Talk:83Plus:Hooks:9B88"
From WikiTI
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::No, but calling it the GetCSC hook without specifically mentioning that it doesn't work when you call getcsc is also very confusing. Thus I think that the hook should either be renamed or it should specifically mention that it has nothing to do with the GetCSC B_CALL. [[User:Mmartin|Mmartin]] 01:06, 28 Mar 2005 (PST) | ::No, but calling it the GetCSC hook without specifically mentioning that it doesn't work when you call getcsc is also very confusing. Thus I think that the hook should either be renamed or it should specifically mention that it has nothing to do with the GetCSC B_CALL. [[User:Mmartin|Mmartin]] 01:06, 28 Mar 2005 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::You're right. How's this? [[User:FloppusMaximus|FloppusMaximus]] 01:18, 28 Mar 2005 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Looks good, let's keep it this way unless someway finds a better name. [[User:Mmartin|Mmartin]] 01:30, 28 Mar 2005 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:30, 28 March 2005
This hook doesn't work when you only use getcsc calls, it only works inside the GetKey B_CALL. Thus I think the name getcschook is more confusing than the name getkeyhook. The hook is called everytime the os detects a keypress during the getcschook, but before the Raw Key Hook is called and it's also called when keys like 2nd or alpha are pressed.
Mmartin 00:50, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
- That's true... but calling it the 'GetKeyHook' has already been shown to confuse people. We've certainly had enough bad names proposed for both of them: can you think of one that won't cause any confusion? FloppusMaximus 00:55, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
- No, but calling it the GetCSC hook without specifically mentioning that it doesn't work when you call getcsc is also very confusing. Thus I think that the hook should either be renamed or it should specifically mention that it has nothing to do with the GetCSC B_CALL. Mmartin 01:06, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
- You're right. How's this? FloppusMaximus 01:18, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
- Looks good, let's keep it this way unless someway finds a better name. Mmartin 01:30, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
