Difference between revisions of "Category talk:83Plus:BCALLs:By Name"
From WikiTI
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::That makes a lot of sense. Clearly, we have failed to comprehend what "There are X articles in this category" means. | :::That makes a lot of sense. Clearly, we have failed to comprehend what "There are X articles in this category" means. | ||
:::Hmm... seems it stops ignoring case when you start moving about (compare [http://wikiti.denglend.net/index.php?title=Category:83Plus:BCALLs:By_Name], [http://wikiti.denglend.net/index.php?title=Category:83Plus:BCALLs:By_Name&until=ZeroToCertificate].) [[User:FloppusMaximus|FloppusMaximus]] 06:25, 8 Dec 2005 (PST) | :::Hmm... seems it stops ignoring case when you start moving about (compare [http://wikiti.denglend.net/index.php?title=Category:83Plus:BCALLs:By_Name], [http://wikiti.denglend.net/index.php?title=Category:83Plus:BCALLs:By_Name&until=ZeroToCertificate].) [[User:FloppusMaximus|FloppusMaximus]] 06:25, 8 Dec 2005 (PST) | ||
− | |||
:::: Ah. Well I changed the category limit to 400 because it was pissing me off --Dan | :::: Ah. Well I changed the category limit to 400 because it was pissing me off --Dan | ||
+ | :::Probably because JMan only hacked the one part of the script. :) [[User:AndyJ|Andy Janata]] 04:46, 12 Dec 2005 (PST) |
Revision as of 04:46, 12 December 2005
Why are there 180 items in this category and 183 items in the "by address" category?
- Hey, that's only 1.6 percent... not bad! Because the letter Z (83Plus:BCALLs:4A65, 83Plus:BCALLs:4A68, 83Plus:BCALLs:802A) does not exist. Administrators? Are we missing anything else? FloppusMaximus 17:37, 7 Dec 2005 (PST)
- It only shows 200 items per page. This includes subcategories. Click the (next 200) link. Andy Janata 04:41, 8 Dec 2005 (PST)
- That makes a lot of sense. Clearly, we have failed to comprehend what "There are X articles in this category" means.
- Hmm... seems it stops ignoring case when you start moving about (compare [1], [2].) FloppusMaximus 06:25, 8 Dec 2005 (PST)
- Ah. Well I changed the category limit to 400 because it was pissing me off --Dan
- Probably because JMan only hacked the one part of the script. :) Andy Janata 04:46, 12 Dec 2005 (PST)