Difference between revisions of "Talk:83Plus:BCALLs:4C93"
From WikiTI
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:If you read it, you know it says: 'The code is:' That means the following is the code taken from the TI-OS. -- 84plusfreak | :If you read it, you know it says: 'The code is:' That means the following is the code taken from the TI-OS. -- 84plusfreak | ||
::Hmm, still, one would think TI would be overly safe and reset the subtimer too... --[[User:AndyJ|AndyJ]] 06:29, 4 May 2005 (PDT) | ::Hmm, still, one would think TI would be overly safe and reset the subtimer too... --[[User:AndyJ|AndyJ]] 06:29, 4 May 2005 (PDT) | ||
| − | :::In that case I should probably mention that code from TIOS is copyrighted and should not be posted on the wiki. --[[User: | + | :::In that case I should probably mention that code from TIOS is copyrighted and should not be posted on the wiki. --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 18:09, 4 May 2005 (PDT) |
Revision as of 17:09, 4 May 2005
Resetting it yourself
Shouldn't you also reset the apdSubTimer if you're going to reset it yourself? Granted, that's only a second or two, but still... If you're going to say how you can do it yourself, you should get it right. :P --AndyJ 23:11, 3 May 2005 (PDT)
- If you read it, you know it says: 'The code is:' That means the following is the code taken from the TI-OS. -- 84plusfreak
- Hmm, still, one would think TI would be overly safe and reset the subtimer too... --AndyJ 06:29, 4 May 2005 (PDT)
- In that case I should probably mention that code from TIOS is copyrighted and should not be posted on the wiki. --Dan Englender 18:09, 4 May 2005 (PDT)
- Hmm, still, one would think TI would be overly safe and reset the subtimer too... --AndyJ 06:29, 4 May 2005 (PDT)
