Difference between revisions of "Talk:History of the TI Z80 community"
From WikiTI
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I really don't think mentioning every single DS product is nessacry. the maybe well produced but They aren't alone in that. Some of them should be on the proof of concept page. Anyway I think looking back at significant events woulds more helpful.--[[User:Jim e|Jim e]] 18:52, 15 July 2006 (PDT) | I really don't think mentioning every single DS product is nessacry. the maybe well produced but They aren't alone in that. Some of them should be on the proof of concept page. Anyway I think looking back at significant events woulds more helpful.--[[User:Jim e|Jim e]] 18:52, 15 July 2006 (PDT) | ||
| − | I have to agree with Jim E here. This shouldn't be the history of Detached Solution. Something like "First Application Shell" would be possible, but the release of DAWG ( | + | I have to agree with Jim E here. This shouldn't be the history of Detached Solution. Something like "First Application Shell" would be possible, but the release of DAWG (even if it's a nice prog) is rather unimportant in the history of the community. --[[User:Kv83|kv83]] 23:39, 15 July 2006 (PDT) |
Revision as of 22:40, 15 July 2006
- I've added DS's history <offtopic love of DS>because I consider their products to be leaps and bounds above other programs/apps. They documented A LOT of BCALLS, hooks, etc. when barely anyone knew about them. They've revolutionized programming for the TI-83 Plus</offtopic>. It is because of them that this wiki exists. Saibot84 09:16, 15 July 2006 (PDT)
- This history goes farther back. I believe it all began with ti-files. Do we have any info on them? (preceding unsigned comment by Toksyuryel (talk • contribs) 17:23, 15 July 2006 (PDT))
I really don't think mentioning every single DS product is nessacry. the maybe well produced but They aren't alone in that. Some of them should be on the proof of concept page. Anyway I think looking back at significant events woulds more helpful.--Jim e 18:52, 15 July 2006 (PDT)
I have to agree with Jim E here. This shouldn't be the history of Detached Solution. Something like "First Application Shell" would be possible, but the release of DAWG (even if it's a nice prog) is rather unimportant in the history of the community. --kv83 23:39, 15 July 2006 (PDT)
