Difference between revisions of "Talk:WikiTI Home"
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
::: Considering the dynamic nature of a wiki (a page could be edited, at pretty much any time), I wouldn't mind not having it cached. (Though I would personally disable browser caching altogether if firefox would let me... :P ) --[[User:Aquanight|Aquanight]] 22:44, 1 Apr 2005 (PST) | ::: Considering the dynamic nature of a wiki (a page could be edited, at pretty much any time), I wouldn't mind not having it cached. (Though I would personally disable browser caching altogether if firefox would let me... :P ) --[[User:Aquanight|Aquanight]] 22:44, 1 Apr 2005 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::: Er... I think I see what you mean... stuff is getting cached when it shouldn't be. (I could've sworn I told firefox to only use 0 KB (aka none) for cache and it's still caching ... argh.) --[[User:Aquanight|Aquanight]] 22:46, 1 Apr 2005 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 22:46, 1 April 2005
Contents
Discussion
What do you think about this wiki?
More!
I think it needs information on more calculators than just the Ti-83+ series, and general assembly information (like a good cathegorized tutorial overview for instance) wouldn't hurt either, I think :)
Timendus
I hope we can do that soon
Just, we don't want to waste time getting it all set up for that and have no one use it. If we see a lot of people milling around here, contributing, then by all means, we'll expand. But one thing we DON'T want to do is mirror 28 Days. We can link TO it, but we don't want it actually here.
--AndyJ 06:50, 27 Mar 2005 (PST)
Categories
On many pages, there is now a sizable blank space at the top due to several lines of category links. What, if anything, should we do about this? FloppusMaximus 19:06, 29 Mar 2005 (PST)
Move them?
Move the Category links to the bottom should do it. :) That, or put them all on one line.
--AndyJ 19:07, 29 Mar 2005 (PST)
- Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. :) FloppusMaximus 20:18, 29 Mar 2005 (PST)
- I think I officially qualify as a robot now. You can tell I was getting tired towards the end, as I missed the minor-edit button a few times... sorry about that... FloppusMaximus 21:28, 29 Mar 2005 (PST)
Caching
Is it just me, or are there some serious caching problems here? FloppusMaximus 21:32, 1 Apr 2005 (PST)
- In particular? --Dan Englender 21:42, 1 Apr 2005 (PST)
- Ya, the wiki seems to have weird caching problems, especially since it appears the reload the page every time, even if it doesn't get changes. I don't know what's up. --AndyJ 22:35, 1 Apr 2005 (PST)
- Considering the dynamic nature of a wiki (a page could be edited, at pretty much any time), I wouldn't mind not having it cached. (Though I would personally disable browser caching altogether if firefox would let me... :P ) --Aquanight 22:44, 1 Apr 2005 (PST)
- Er... I think I see what you mean... stuff is getting cached when it shouldn't be. (I could've sworn I told firefox to only use 0 KB (aka none) for cache and it's still caching ... argh.) --Aquanight 22:46, 1 Apr 2005 (PST)
