Difference between revisions of "Talk:83Plus:BCALLs:4009"
From WikiTI
(usefulness) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this really a "useful utility call"? There's a huge overhead for merely using a bcall, just for a routine that would be 4 bytes when inlined instead of 3 bytes when bcalled. | Is this really a "useful utility call"? There's a huge overhead for merely using a bcall, just for a routine that would be 4 bytes when inlined instead of 3 bytes when bcalled. | ||
| + | : The only overhead is some clock cycles. If you care about space and not about speed then yes, it's a useful utility call. It's all a matter of priorities :) --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 14:18, 27 March 2006 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 15:18, 27 March 2006
Is this really a "useful utility call"? There's a huge overhead for merely using a bcall, just for a routine that would be 4 bytes when inlined instead of 3 bytes when bcalled.
- The only overhead is some clock cycles. If you care about space and not about speed then yes, it's a useful utility call. It's all a matter of priorities :) --Dan Englender 14:18, 27 March 2006 (PST)
