Difference between revisions of "Talk:83Plus:BCALLs:4F00"
From WikiTI
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
After disassembling some code, does it sound reasonable if this routine is like RecAByteIO (which appears to be bport only) but with code that handles the SE link-assist? [[User:Gambit|Gambit]] 14:58, 10 June 2006 (PDT) | After disassembling some code, does it sound reasonable if this routine is like RecAByteIO (which appears to be bport only) but with code that handles the SE link-assist? [[User:Gambit|Gambit]] 14:58, 10 June 2006 (PDT) | ||
:That seems surprising considering that the entry point existed on pre-SE calculators, but I haven't tried disassembling it yet to check. --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 01:47, 11 June 2006 (PDT) | :That seems surprising considering that the entry point existed on pre-SE calculators, but I haven't tried disassembling it yet to check. --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 01:47, 11 June 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | ::Sorry about the Category mixup - I just changed the URL and didn't bother to look at the category bit. | ||
| + | ::Assuming I got the keystrokes right, I saw the code reading from [[83Plus:Ports:09|port 09h]], and immediately assumed that the two were related somehow. Of course, I could be wrong, but I felt it was better to submit something than nothing :) ([[Wikipedia:WP:BB|Be bold]]!) [[User:Gambit|Gambit]] 13:37, 13 June 2006 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:37, 13 June 2006
After disassembling some code, does it sound reasonable if this routine is like RecAByteIO (which appears to be bport only) but with code that handles the SE link-assist? Gambit 14:58, 10 June 2006 (PDT)
- That seems surprising considering that the entry point existed on pre-SE calculators, but I haven't tried disassembling it yet to check. --Dan Englender 01:47, 11 June 2006 (PDT)
- Sorry about the Category mixup - I just changed the URL and didn't bother to look at the category bit.
- Assuming I got the keystrokes right, I saw the code reading from port 09h, and immediately assumed that the two were related somehow. Of course, I could be wrong, but I felt it was better to submit something than nothing :) (Be bold!) Gambit 13:37, 13 June 2006 (PDT)
