Difference between revisions of "Talk:Z80 Good Programming Practices"

From WikiTI
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:Well I agree that the title may be misleading, but I think that for the most part the content would be ok for a sort of "programming tips" section of a larger programming guide.  In any case, feel free to add/change as you see fit.  --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 12:56, 20 September 2006 (PDT)
 
:Well I agree that the title may be misleading, but I think that for the most part the content would be ok for a sort of "programming tips" section of a larger programming guide.  In any case, feel free to add/change as you see fit.  --[[User:Dan Englender|Dan Englender]] 12:56, 20 September 2006 (PDT)
 
::Yeah, some of the stuff (like the section on lookup tables) should say when it's more efficient to use it and when it's not (with only a few options and sequential numbers, dec a / jp z,X / dec a / jp z,Y... would be more efficient), but the idea is good. --[[User:Burntfuse|burntfuse]] 11:30, 24 September 2006 (PDT)
 
::Yeah, some of the stuff (like the section on lookup tables) should say when it's more efficient to use it and when it's not (with only a few options and sequential numbers, dec a / jp z,X / dec a / jp z,Y... would be more efficient), but the idea is good. --[[User:Burntfuse|burntfuse]] 11:30, 24 September 2006 (PDT)
 +
 +
::I took out the ix think because it was VERY wrong, I don't know why I didn't notice it before. Opcodes were used that didn't exist, the situation  for ix usage was poor and less optimized.  Now without that there is only the LUT thing, I still think this page is pointless.--[[User:Jim e|Jim e]] 00:29, 27 December 2006 (PST)

Revision as of 01:29, 27 December 2006

To be honest this article is questionable in its function, as "good practices" is relative per situation. The examples given are bad examples when to do what is suggested. Further there isn't much substance here and it's poorly defined what would belong here. A programming guide would be a better idea than this. --Jim e 12:20, 20 September 2006 (PDT)

Well I agree that the title may be misleading, but I think that for the most part the content would be ok for a sort of "programming tips" section of a larger programming guide. In any case, feel free to add/change as you see fit. --Dan Englender 12:56, 20 September 2006 (PDT)
Yeah, some of the stuff (like the section on lookup tables) should say when it's more efficient to use it and when it's not (with only a few options and sequential numbers, dec a / jp z,X / dec a / jp z,Y... would be more efficient), but the idea is good. --burntfuse 11:30, 24 September 2006 (PDT)
I took out the ix think because it was VERY wrong, I don't know why I didn't notice it before. Opcodes were used that didn't exist, the situation for ix usage was poor and less optimized. Now without that there is only the LUT thing, I still think this page is pointless.--Jim e 00:29, 27 December 2006 (PST)